Brain Game Tennis

  • Zoom
  • Balls
  • Webinars
    • 1: Winning Singles Strategy
    • 2: Winning Doubles Strategy
    • 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns
    • 4: Return Strategy & Patterns
    • 5 FREE 2022 US Open: Alcaraz v Sinner Analysis
    • 6 Net Strategy & Patterns
    • 7: Baseline Strategy & Patterns
    • 8: The Mental Game
    • 9: 25 Favorite Drills
    • 10: Primary & Secondary
    • 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks
    • 12: Team Djokovic
    • 13: How Not To Lose
    • 14: Forehand Playbook
    • 15: Backhand Playbook
    • 16: Serve +1 Strategy
    • 17: Return +1 Strategy
    • 18: FREE Djokovic 2023 Australia Analysis
    • 19: Drop Shots & Lobs
    • 20: Own The Net & Cover The Lob
    • 21: Serve & Volley | Return & Volley
    • 22: Run Around Forehands
    • 23: Point Score Strategy
    • 24: Andre Agassi Patterns Of Play
    • 25: Anticipation & Positioning
    • 26: ABCD Baseline Locations
    • 27: Winners & Errors
    • 28: Dynamic Defense
    • 29: Match Rituals
    • 30: Volley & Overhead Technique
    • 31: 2023 Wimbledon Alcaraz v Djokovic Analysis
    • 32: Hitting Down The Line
    • 33: First Strike Tennis
    • 34: The 8 Serve Locations
    • 35: Backhand Cage
    • 36: Make Better Decisions
    • 37: 25 Underrated Tactics
    • 38: Aggressive Returns
    • 39: Passing Shots
    • 40: Climbing The Ladder
    • 41: Opponent Awareness
    • 42: Interior Footwork & Spacing
    • 43: Depth Before Direction
    • 44: Approach Shots
    • 45: How To Build A Point
    • 46: 8 Ways To Force An Error
    • 47: Backhand Slice Situations
    • 48: Game Plans
    • 49: Position A Mastery
    • 50: Position D Mastery
    • 51: Lefties
    • 52: Playing Behind
    • 53: Pre-Match Nerves
    • 54: 1st Point Of The Game
    • 55: All Court Player
    • 56: 2nd Serve Return Prowess
    • 57: Forehand Errors In 0-4 Shots
    • 58: Serve +1 Approach
    • 59: Slice Returns
    • 60: Doubles Return Strategy
    • 61: Improve Your Serve Accuracy
    • 62: Stay On The Shot
    • 63: Two-Shot Combinations
    • 64: Attacking From D To A
    • 65: Reducing Risk
    • 66: Depth Is The Diamond
    • 67: Defensive Forehands
    • 68: Recovering For Next Shot
    • 69: Reduce Net Errors
    • 70: Closing Out A Set
    • 71: Serve +2
    • 72: Improve Your Variety
    • 73: Winning On Defense
    • 74: How To Analyze A Match
    • 75: Practice Like A Pro
    • 76: Copy Carlos Alcaraz
    • 77: Master The Fundamentals
    • 78: What Matters Most To Winning
    • 79: Best Patterns Of Play
    • 80: How To Talk To Yourself
    • 81: First Volleys
    • 82: Get Into Your Opponent’s Head
  • Strategy Courses
    • The First 4 Shots
      • The Mode = 1
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Bullseye = 3 Shots
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: 1-7 Shots Breakdown
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Shorter > Longer
      • Men 2015/16 Australian Open: Champion Analysis
      • North Carolina High School Tennis
      • The Serve Shockwave
      • Everyone’s Game Style = First Strike
      • Where Players Lose
      • Junior to Pro First Strike Pathway
      • Men’s College Tennis
      • Women’s College Tennis
      • Boy’s 12’s
      • Boy’s 14’s
      • Boy’s 16’s
      • Boy’s 18’s
      • Girl’s 18’s
    • Short Ball Hunter
      • Baseline v Net
      • Wimbledon Approaching 2002 – 2015
      • 2015 US Open: 2nd Week
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Backhand
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Forehand
      • Junior & College Data
      • Roger Federer Prowling
      • Roger Federer: Hitting A FH v BH Approach
      • Roger Federer: Approach to Forehand v Backhand
      • Roger Federer: Approach Situations
      • Roger Federer: SABR
      • 2015 Australian Open Men: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Women: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Juniors: Best Time To Approach
      • 50-50 Ball
      • Approach Middle
      • Half Court Players
      • Court Position & Time
    • 25 GR Singles
      • Foundations
      • #1 Eight Serve Locations
      • #2 Eight Serve Factors
      • #3 Serve + 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 2
      • #5 Serve Situations
      • #6 First Serves
      • #7 Second Serves
      • #8 Return Situations
      • #9 Returning 1st Serves
      • #10 Returning 2nd Serves
      • #11 Break Points
      • #12 Return Approach
      • #13 Return Winner
      • #14 A B C D
      • #15 Rally Percentages
      • #16 Sword & Shield
      • #17 Run Around Forehand
      • #18 The 2-1
      • #19 Climbing The Ladder
      • #20 Backhand Cage
      • #21 Backhand Line
      • #22 Drop Shots
      • #23 Approaching
      • #24 1st Volley Behind
      • #25 Pass Cross
    • 25 GR Doubles
      • #1 Center Window
      • #2 Where To Stand
      • #3 Forget The Lines
      • #4 Don’t Follow The Ball
      • #5 Don’t Change Directions
      • #6 Don’t Cover The Line
      • #7 Best Serve Locations
      • #8 Best Return Locations
      • #9 The J
      • #10 The V
      • #11 Volley Targets
      • #12 Two Back
      • #13 Lob Returns
      • #14 Lobbing
      • #15 Serve Formations
      • #16 Low Middle
      • #17 Assign The Middle
      • #18 Power Play
      • #19 Home Base
      • #20 Three Feet
      • #21 R. Partner Neutral
      • #22 Fake & Bake
      • #23 Beach Volleyball
      • #24 Not Hitting = Moving
      • #25 Communicate
    • Num3ers
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Ideal Point
      • Be A High % Player
      • Faster Future
      • Grinding
      • Long Rallies Don’t Matter
      • The Bottom Line: Women
      • The Bottom Line: Men
    • Dou8les Num3ers
      • Building Blocks
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Last Shot: Net v Baseline
      • Last Shot: Server v Returner
      • Last Shot: Winner v Error
      • Last Shot: Serving Team
      • Last Shot: Returning Team
      • 1st Serves
      • 2nd Serves
      • Unreturned Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Groundstroke Winners
      • Stephen Huss – 2005 Wimbledon Champion
    • Between The Points
      • Introduction
      • Two Matches
      • 5 Step Routine
      • 3 Opponents
      • Strings
      • Voices In My Head
      • 55%
      • Leaking Cup
      • Storm Cloud
      • Finish Line
      • Getting Tight: Sample Page
      • Federico Coria: Fear
      • Andre Agassi: Shower
      • Djokovic 2014 Wimbledon
    • Million Pts College Tennis
      • Points Won/Lost
      • Total Net Points
      • Net Points Won
      • Serve +1 FH / BH
      • Serve +1 Errors
      • Serve +1 Winners
      • Serve +1: 3 Outcomes
      • Return +1 FH / BH
      • Return +1 Winners
      • Return +1 Errors
      • Return +1: 3 Outcomes
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • 1st Serves Deuce Court
      • 1st Serves Ad Court
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • 2nd Serves Deuce Court
      • 2nd Serves Ad Court
      • Deuce Court Aces
      • Ad Court Aces
      • Double Faults / 2nd Serves Lost
      • Deuce Court Double Faults
      • Ad Court Double Faults
      • Serving: Deuce & Ad Combined
      • Return Errors
      • Return Errors – Deuce Ct
      • Return Errors – Ad Court
      • Return Errors vs 1st Serves
      • Return Errors vs 2nd Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Deuce Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Deuce Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
    • Getting Tight
      • Getting Tight – Introduction
      • Getting Hijacked
      • Permission To Miss
      • Pre-Match 1 – Expectations
      • Pre-Match 2 – Visualize
      • Pre-Match 3 – Filters
      • Pre-Match 4 – Arousal
      • Set 1 – Adrenalin
      • Set 1 – Internally Focused
      • Set 1 Permission Slips
      • Sets 2&3 – Exhausted
      • Sets 2&3 – Survival Mode
      • Sets 2&3 – Backhand Permission
      • Match Analytics 1
      • Match Analytics 2
      • Match Analytics 3
      • Match Analytics 4
      • Match Analytics 5
      • On Court – Drop Shot
      • On Court – Backhand Line
      • On Court – Return Of Serve
      • Francisco Clavet – 1
      • Francisco Clavet – 2
      • Francisco Clavet – 3
      • Review 1
      • Review 2
      • Review 3
      • Match: Jeff 1st Serves
      • Match: Jeff 2nd Serves
      • Match: Francisco 1st Serves
      • Match: Francisco’s 2nd Serves
      • Match Intelligence 1
      • Match Intelligence 2
      • Match Intelligence 3
    • GamePlan
      • Welcome To GAMEPLAN
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • First Point Serving
      • The 43% Upgrade
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • Break Points
      • Returns: Forehand v Backhand
      • Returns: Made/Winners/Errors
      • Returns: Deuce Court
      • Returns: Ad Court
      • Double Faults
      • The First 4 Shots: Murray v Nishikori
      • Strategy Analysis 1 – Becoming No. 1 In The World
      • Strategy Analysis 2 – Climbing The Rankings
    • Dirtballer
      • START HERE — Introduction
      • Men Rally Length: 2017 RG vs US Open
      • Women Rally Length: 2017 RG vs. US Open
      • 2016 RG vs 2017 Australian Open
      • Nadal Dominance On Clay
      • Nadal Career Stats – Clay vs Hard
      • Rafael Nadal: 23 Masters 1000 Matches
      • More Lessons
  • Presentations
  • Blog
  • About Craig
    • AI Tennis Data Dashboard
    • AI College Data Dashboard
    • Match IQ: College Tennis
    • Match IQ: Pro Tennis
    • Business Speaking
    • Success Stories
    • Team Djokovic 2017-2019
    • Interviews
    • Tennis Channel Feature: Moneyball In Tennis
    • Tennis Channel One Minute Clinics
    • Tennis Magazine Feature
    • Border Mail Front Page
    • ATP Match Analysis
    • ATP Beyond The Numbers
    • Craig In The News
Buy Tennis Strategy
  • Home
  • Return Of Serve
  • 2026 Wimbledon. All The Return Data You Need To Know
CLICK HERE To Purchase Webinars & Courses.
CLICK HERE To Purchase Zoom Lessons
TENNIS , AUSTRALIAN OPEN, MELBOURNE PARK, MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA, GRAND SLAM, HARD COURT, OUTDOOR, ITF, ATP, WTA, 2023, © TENNIS PHOTO NETWORK
Tuesday, 14 July 2026 / Published in Return Of Serve, Wimbledon

2026 Wimbledon. All The Return Data You Need To Know

G’day,

The focus is typically on serving and getting to the net when we analyze Wimbledon data. After all, it is a grass court  tournament! To wrap up another amazing Championships, let’s do something different this time and dive into return-of-serve averages to uncover what matters most for winning. You will also find tournament averages for the two champions, Jannick Sinner and Linda Noskova.


1/ RETURNS IN 

  • Men = 64% | Sinner 69%
  • Women = 69% | Noskova 71%

Making two out of three returns in play is about normal for the men and women. As you look to win more return points, focus on making 70%+ of your returns. That may mean blocking or slicing more than you normally do. The problem is that if you get returns in play, and they are weak, they are going to get punished with Serve +1 forehands. If you go for too much, then you risk missing too many. It’s all about the balance and finding what works against specific opponents.


2/ RETURNS POINTS WON vs. 1ST SERVES

  • Men = 26% | Sinner 27%
  • Women = 34% | Noskova 34%

The focus here is defensive returns. Learn to block powerful first serves deep back into the court to take the time away from the server. The other alternative is to move far back behind the baseline (think Daniil Medvedev) so that you can let the first serve slow down to make it easier to handle.


IMPROVE YOUR RETURN GAME

Webinar 4: Return Strategy & Patterns

Webinar 17: Return +1 Strategy

Webinar 21: Return & Volley

Webinar 38: Aggressive Returns

Webinar 56: 2nd Serve Return Prowess


3/ RETURN POINTS WON vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men = 49% | Sinner 55%
  • Women = 53% | Noskova 53%

This is a stronghold of winning tennis matches. As you can see above, winning one out of three points returning first serves is what you can expect. But not here. This is a chance to tip the scales above 50% and own your opponents’ 2nd serve. By winning greater than 50% of second serve return points, you have made your opponent’s second serve a weapon of your own game. As you would expect, Sinner really dominated in this area, winning 55% of opponent’s second serve points. In the semi-final vs. Novak Djokovic, Sinner won a jaw-dropping 66% (25/38).


4/ BREAK POINTS WON

  • Men = 36% |Sinner 36%
  • Women = 41% | Noskova 41%

These critical one-off situations decide matches more than anything else. Once again, the chance of breaking is around two out of three for the men and slightly higher for the women. It’s not so much that you need to raise your game in these situations. It’s much more about continuing the same game plan, the same strategy that got you to break point. Stick with the patterns that you know work. This is a hard stat to really move the needle. Notice both Sinner and Noskova were right at the tournament average.


5/ RETURN GAMES WON

  • Men = 17% | Sinner 20%
  • Women = 29% | Noskova 28%

Winning just two return games out of 10 – or one out of five – is successful in the men’s draw, while three out of 10 is the benchmark for the women. All of the small return components such as footwork, spacing to the ball, direction of the return and mixing in power, spin and depth all manifest in this stat. You need to be able to break serve, and you need to work on achieving these averages – and then some.


6/ RETURNS IN vs 1ST SERVES

  • Men = 59% | Sinner 61%
  • Women = 70% | Noskova 66%

The power and force of the first serve extracts a sizeable amount of return errors. The men average failing to put four out of 10 returns back in play, while the women miss three. You can see Sinner was slightly above the tournament average, while Noskova was below the tournament average. Tough to move the needle here.


7/ RETURNS IN vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men = 81% | Sinner 84%
  • Women = 80% | Noskova 80%

One of the worst errors you can make in a match (besides a self-inflicted double fault) is putting a second serve return in the net. That’s a momentum killer. Yes, you are always looking to be aggressive when returning second serves, but you must have two plans in place. The first is to attack. The second is to respect a quality second serve and make sure you make it, not overplay.


8/ FOREHAND RETURNS IN vs 1ST SERVES

  • Men = 70% | Sinner 70%
  • Women = 76% | Noskova 75%

It’s interesting that Sinner couldn’t climb higher than the tournament average here. Typically, forehand returns are missed from quality wide serves in the Deuce court. The wide slider is tough to keep in front of the body, and players do not always adjust the size of their backswing on the forehand return, leading to errors. The women put more in play, which mainly reflects that the first serve is less potent than in the men’s game.


9/ BACKHAND RETURNS IN vs 1ST SERVES

  • Men = 70% | Sinner 67%
  • Women = 75% | Noskova 77%

I would not have thought Sinner would end up three percentage points below the tournament average here. His backhand return is short and simple and typically is one of the best on tour in this department. Noskova edges slightly higher than the tournament average, finding small gains all over the court to help her take the title.


10/ FOREHAND RETURNS IN vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men = 78% | Sinner 84%
  • Women = 78% | Noskova 74%

Sinner does an outstanding job here of climbing six percentage points higher than the tournament average with his aggressive forehand return in the court against second serves. He is not going to let this golden opportunity go by without inflicting pressure on the server. Noskova fell below the tournament average with forehand returns, but as you see below, was above it with backhand returns.


11/ BACKHAND RETURNS IN vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men = 83% | Sinner 86%
  • Women = 82% | Noskova 85%

Winning and losing happens right here. It’s very common on big points for the server to direct their second serve to the backhand return. If you have a strong backhand return – especially attacking against 2nd serves – then you have the ability to deliver a tough Serve +1 groundstroke for the server and instantly get ahead in the point.


12/ AVERAGE FOREHAND RETURN SPEED vs 1st SERVES

  • Men = 98 km/h | Sinner 107 km/h
  • Women = 99 km/h | | Noskova 102 km/h

On one hand, faster is not always better. On the other hand, we play a sport that takes time away from our opponent. Both Sinner and Noskova were above the tournament average here. In many ways, this is about taking the speed of the opponent’s first serve and using it back against them. It’s about rebounding energy rather than generating it all yourself.


13/ AVERAGE BACKHAND RETURN SPEED vs 1st SERVES

  • Men = 94 km/h | Sinner 98 km/h
  • Women = 97 km/h | | Noskova 98%

As you would expect, average backhand return speed is slower than average forehand speed against first serves – but not by much. It’s four km/h for the men and only two km/h for the women. Return speed is just one of the factors that go into being successful with backhand returns against first serves. Getting it deep is a prime mover in this area.


14/ AVERAGE FOREHAND RETURN SPEED vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men =  116 km/h | Sinner 129 km/h
  • Women = 115 km/h | Noskova 126 km/h

Wow! Both Sinner and Noskova blow the tournament average out of the water by hammering their opponent’s second serve. Sinner is 13 km/h above the average, and Noskova is 11 km/h. Both Wimbledon champions send a clear message here. You have got to attack your opponent’s 2nd serve with your forehand return. Hammer it when possible. Force as many Serve +1 errors as you can.


15/ AVERAGE BACKHAND RETURN SPEED vs 2ND SERVES

  • Men = 110 km/h | Sinner 118 km/h
  • Women = 111 km/h | Noskova 117 km/h

Sinner and Noskova send the same message here. Second serves are to be attacked. Sinner is eight km/h above the tournament average, and Noskova is seven. As soon as the first serve is missed, it’s instant attack mode against the second serve. Got to lean on the ball no matter if you’re returning inside the baseline or behind it.


SUMMARY

All of this wonderful Wimbledon return data provides an excellent road map for becoming a better returner. It clearly shows where Sinner and Noskova stood out from the pack, and also what averages you need to work towards as you develop your game. Lastly, get creative with these numbers and design drills to bring them to life on the practice court.

 

 

 

  • Tweet

The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Join 1000's of other tennis players. Enter your email address to get exclusive access to all our latest tennis strategies, including behind the scenes photos, videos & more!

Ten Tennis Strategy Products

Brain Game Tennis is the world leader researching and teaching strategy in tennis. Below are ten products to choose from to remove the guesswork and opinion from your game.

THE FIRST 4 SHOTS

The practice court is clearly broken. Here’s the proof.

Points are "front loaded". By far the majority of the action, and the winning, takes place in THE FIRST 4 SHOTS. The practice court is full of long rallies. Matches are dominated by short rallies. There is a massive disconnect occurring.

We spend too much time grinding, banging balls up and down the middle of the court – that have no real benefit to winning tennis matches.

There are 3 specific rally lengths in tennis. Here is their percentage breakdown of total points.

0-4 Shots = 70%
5-8 Shots = 20%
9+ Shots = 10%

The First 4 Shots is specifically the serve, return, Serve +1 groundstroke and Return +1 groundstroke. Those are normally the shots that get practiced the least, but matter the most to winning tennis matches.

Short Ball Hunter

The net is an extremely high percentage place to be!

If you love playing tennis for fun, spend as much time at the baseline as you like. But if you compete – if the score matters – then you must turn your attention to the net to maximize your potential.

The “herd mentality” in tennis thinks it’s too tough to approach the net in today’s game. The conversation starts with improved string technology, more powerful rackets, and finishes with stronger, faster athletes. The herd think approaching is a relic of the past. The herd is WRONG!

AVERAGE WIN %
Baseline = 46%
Net = 66%

Data from ALL Grand Slams provides the facts about approach and volley, and the data is crystal clear – it’s immensely better than staying back at the baseline, grinding for a living.

Num3ers

The baseline is a tough place to create separation. Here's how to do it.

At the 2012 US Open, only 7 men and 14 women had a winning percentage from the baseline. At Wimbledon 2016, Andy Murray won the title only winning 52% of his baseline points - and he is one of the very best at it in the world!

Num3ers deeply explores the data that rules points, especially from the back of the court. Take a "deep dive" into all three rally lengths (0-4, 5-8, 9+), and winner and errors totals from the elite level of our game. The numbers will shock you!

All 4 Grand Slams

Forcing Errors = 41% Men / 37% Women
Winners = 32% Men / 29% Women
Unforced Errors = 27% Men / 34% Women

Num3ers is very much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. It's about bringing together different data sets together to create the big picture.

Dou8les Num3ers

Doubles Numbers

Every recorded match from the 2015 Australian Open - Rd2 to the final.

There is a lot happening on a doubles court. Situations and strategies are constantly being adjusted to create mis-matches with court position. It's hard to keep track of - until now. Dou8les Num3ers is the most comprehensive analysis of doubles data in our sport. The focus is on how a point ends, and it's broken down eight ways to Sunday. Specifically, you find critical information on:

Winners rise to the #1 way a point ends (over forced & unforced errors)

- The last shot of the rally is overwhelmingly struck at the net.
- Center Window: the most important part of a doubles court to control.
- Stephen Huss: an in-depth interview on Wimbledon's Centre Court with the 2005 Wimbledon Doubles Champion.

Dou8les Num3ers leaves no stone unturned. Percentage breakdowns of how often the server or receiver hits the last shot highlight the dramatic influence of the serve. The last shot of the rally is significant, and is broken down into the following categories: volleys, overheads, passing shots, lobs and groundstrokes.

between the points

When you play a match, you actually play two matches.

When you walk out onto a tennis court, there are two matches that you are about to play. The first is during the point - a part of the match that you have spent a lot of time preparing for on the practice court. But there is a second match, that takes place in the 20 seconds between the points. This is where the mental and emotional aspects of our sport kick in.

Let's face it, there will be adversity in almost every tennis match that you play. The storm clouds are coming. How bug they are, and how long they last for, are up to you.

Between the points is very tennis specific. It provides a roadmap for the 20 seconds between the points, teaching how to handle the adversity that will surely come, and how to build on the successes that will also be present. Your mind is your biggest asset in a match, and Between the Points takes your hand off the self destruct button and stops you beating yourself.

25 golden rules of singles strategy

You don't have to be good at everything, but you have got to be good at something.

You can break tennis down into four key elements - serving, returning, rallying and approaching. Each part has specific patterns of play that consistently deliver higher winning percentages than the others. No more guessing. No more opinions. All facets of our sport are covered in this exceptional product, clearly outlining what patterns to gravitate to, and how to best construct the practice court. Data comes primarily from the 2015 Australian Open.

Building Blocks

MEN = 70% errors / 30% winners
WOMEN = 74% errors / 26% winners

Forcing errors is the best way to construct a point.
You can simply break tennis down into primary and secondary patterns of play - and they are all covered here. Primary patterns include serve and return direction, forehands v backhands, and the best way to approach the net. Secondary patterns include drop shots, serve & volley and 1st volley options. If you play tournaments, this product will greatly help you simplify the singles court.

25 golden rules of doubles

The conversation starts & ends with the Center Window.

The doubles court is like an hourglass. There are two big ends, but a small neck in the middle where all the action happens. Once you learn the power of the Center Window, where you stand to start the point will take on a lot more significance.

Doubles is a lot more about situations, with four people on the court all "dancing" with one another. Learn all the best doubles patterns, broken down for the server, returner, server's partner and the returner's partner.

Doubles Situations

The "J" - the most ideal movement for the returner's partner to attack the net.

The "V" - a better way of understanding where the server's partner should move to.

Volley Targets - there are four main areas to attack. Know which ones are higher percentage. Beach Volleyball - the idea of a "setter" and "spiker" is ideal for the doubles court.

There are certain parts of the court that the ball travels to a lot, and other low percentage areas that you really don't want to cover at all - like the alley! In general, the serving team wants to keep the ball in the middle of the court as much as possible (to help the server's partner), while the returning team benefits from hitting wider and creating more chaos in the point.

Dirtballer

Dirtballer clay court tennis course

Getting Tight

Getting Tight tennis strategy course

Welcome to our Twitter Feed

Tweets by @BrainGameTennis

Join The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Enter your email address to get exclusive, behind the scenes photos, videos and interviews!

Contact Craig O’Shannessy


    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    • GET SOCIAL

    © 2019 Brain Game Tennis.
    Designed & Directed by Craig O'Shannessy

    TOP