SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

Brain Game Tennis

  • LOGIN
  • Zoom
  • Balls
  • Webinars
    • 1: Winning Singles Strategy
    • 2: Winning Doubles Strategy
    • 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns
    • 4: Return Strategy & Patterns
    • 5 FREE 2022 US Open: Alcaraz v Sinner Analysis
    • 6 Net Strategy & Patterns
    • 7: Baseline Strategy & Patterns
    • 8: The Mental Game
    • 9: 25 Favorite Drills
    • 10: Primary & Secondary
    • 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks
    • 12: Team Djokovic
    • 13: How Not To Lose
    • 14: Forehand Playbook
    • 15: Backhand Playbook
    • 16: Serve +1 Strategy
    • 17: Return +1 Strategy
    • 18: FREE Djokovic 2023 Australia Analysis
    • 19: Drop Shots & Lobs
    • 20: Own The Net & Cover The Lob
    • 21: Serve & Volley | Return & Volley
    • 22: Run Around Forehands
    • 23: Point Score Strategy
    • 24: Andre Agassi Patterns Of Play
    • 25: Anticipation & Positioning
    • 26: ABCD Baseline Locations
    • 27: Winners & Errors
    • 28: Dynamic Defense
    • 29: Match Rituals
    • 30: Volley & Overhead Technique
    • 31: 2023 Wimbledon Alcaraz v Djokovic Analysis
    • 32: Hitting Down The Line
    • 33: First Strike Tennis
    • 34: The 8 Serve Locations
    • 35: Backhand Cage
    • 36: Make Better Decisions
    • 37: 25 Underrated Tactics
    • 38: Aggressive Returns
    • 39: Passing Shots
    • 40: Climbing The Ladder
    • 41: Opponent Awareness
    • 42: Interior Footwork & Spacing
    • 43: Depth Before Direction
    • 44: Approach Shots
    • 45: How To Build A Point
    • 46: 8 Ways To Force An Error
    • 47: Backhand Slice Situations
    • 48: Game Plans
    • 49: Position A Mastery
    • 50: Position D Mastery
    • 51: Lefties
    • 52: Playing Behind
    • 53: Pre-Match Nerves
    • 54: 1st Point Of The Game
    • 55: All Court Player
    • 56: 2nd Serve Return Prowess
    • 57: Forehand Errors In 0-4 Shots
    • 58: Serve +1 Approach
    • 59: Slice Returns
    • 60: Doubles Return Strategy
    • 61: Improve Your Serve Accuracy
    • 62: Stay On The Shot
    • 63: Two-Shot Combinations
    • 64: Attacking From D To A
    • 65: Reducing Risk
    • 66: Depth Is The Diamond
    • 67: Defensive Forehands
    • 68: Recovering For Next Shot
    • 69: Reduce Net Errors
    • 70: Closing Out A Set
  • Strategy Courses
    • The First 4 Shots
      • The Mode = 1
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Bullseye = 3 Shots
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: 1-7 Shots Breakdown
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Shorter > Longer
      • Men 2015/16 Australian Open: Champion Analysis
      • North Carolina High School Tennis
      • The Serve Shockwave
      • Everyone’s Game Style = First Strike
      • Where Players Lose
      • Junior to Pro First Strike Pathway
      • Men’s College Tennis
      • Women’s College Tennis
      • Boy’s 12’s
      • Boy’s 14’s
      • Boy’s 16’s
      • Boy’s 18’s
      • Girl’s 18’s
    • Short Ball Hunter
      • Baseline v Net
      • Wimbledon Approaching 2002 – 2015
      • 2015 US Open: 2nd Week
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Backhand
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Forehand
      • Junior & College Data
      • Roger Federer Prowling
      • Roger Federer: Hitting A FH v BH Approach
      • Roger Federer: Approach to Forehand v Backhand
      • Roger Federer: Approach Situations
      • Roger Federer: SABR
      • 2015 Australian Open Men: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Women: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Juniors: Best Time To Approach
      • 50-50 Ball
      • Approach Middle
      • Half Court Players
      • Court Position & Time
    • 25 GR Singles
      • Foundations
      • #1 Eight Serve Locations
      • #2 Eight Serve Factors
      • #3 Serve + 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 2
      • #5 Serve Situations
      • #6 First Serves
      • #7 Second Serves
      • #8 Return Situations
      • #9 Returning 1st Serves
      • #10 Returning 2nd Serves
      • #11 Break Points
      • #12 Return Approach
      • #13 Return Winner
      • #14 A B C D
      • #15 Rally Percentages
      • #16 Sword & Shield
      • #17 Run Around Forehand
      • #18 The 2-1
      • #19 Climbing The Ladder
      • #20 Backhand Cage
      • #21 Backhand Line
      • #22 Drop Shots
      • #23 Approaching
      • #24 1st Volley Behind
      • #25 Pass Cross
    • 25 GR Doubles
      • #1 Center Window
      • #2 Where To Stand
      • #3 Forget The Lines
      • #4 Don’t Follow The Ball
      • #5 Don’t Change Directions
      • #6 Don’t Cover The Line
      • #7 Best Serve Locations
      • #8 Best Return Locations
      • #9 The J
      • #10 The V
      • #11 Volley Targets
      • #12 Two Back
      • #13 Lob Returns
      • #14 Lobbing
      • #15 Serve Formations
      • #16 Low Middle
      • #17 Assign The Middle
      • #18 Power Play
      • #19 Home Base
      • #20 Three Feet
      • #21 R. Partner Neutral
      • #22 Fake & Bake
      • #23 Beach Volleyball
      • #24 Not Hitting = Moving
      • #25 Communicate
    • Num3ers
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Ideal Point
      • Be A High % Player
      • Faster Future
      • Grinding
      • Long Rallies Don’t Matter
      • The Bottom Line: Women
      • The Bottom Line: Men
    • Dou8les Num3ers
      • Building Blocks
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Last Shot: Net v Baseline
      • Last Shot: Server v Returner
      • Last Shot: Winner v Error
      • Last Shot: Serving Team
      • Last Shot: Returning Team
      • 1st Serves
      • 2nd Serves
      • Unreturned Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Groundstroke Winners
      • Stephen Huss – 2005 Wimbledon Champion
    • Between The Points
      • Introduction
      • Two Matches
      • 5 Step Routine
      • 3 Opponents
      • Strings
      • Voices In My Head
      • 55%
      • Leaking Cup
      • Storm Cloud
      • Finish Line
      • Getting Tight: Sample Page
      • Federico Coria: Fear
      • Andre Agassi: Shower
      • Djokovic 2014 Wimbledon
    • Million Pts College Tennis
      • Points Won/Lost
      • Total Net Points
      • Net Points Won
      • Serve +1 FH / BH
      • Serve +1 Errors
      • Serve +1 Winners
      • Serve +1: 3 Outcomes
      • Return +1 FH / BH
      • Return +1 Winners
      • Return +1 Errors
      • Return +1: 3 Outcomes
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • 1st Serves Deuce Court
      • 1st Serves Ad Court
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • 2nd Serves Deuce Court
      • 2nd Serves Ad Court
      • Deuce Court Aces
      • Ad Court Aces
      • Double Faults / 2nd Serves Lost
      • Deuce Court Double Faults
      • Ad Court Double Faults
      • Serving: Deuce & Ad Combined
      • Return Errors
      • Return Errors – Deuce Ct
      • Return Errors – Ad Court
      • Return Errors vs 1st Serves
      • Return Errors vs 2nd Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Deuce Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Deuce Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
    • Getting Tight
      • Getting Tight – Introduction
      • Getting Hijacked
      • Permission To Miss
      • Pre-Match 1 – Expectations
      • Pre-Match 2 – Visualize
      • Pre-Match 3 – Filters
      • Pre-Match 4 – Arousal
      • Set 1 – Adrenalin
      • Set 1 – Internally Focused
      • Set 1 Permission Slips
      • Sets 2&3 – Exhausted
      • Sets 2&3 – Survival Mode
      • Sets 2&3 – Backhand Permission
      • Match Analytics 1
      • Match Analytics 2
      • Match Analytics 3
      • Match Analytics 4
      • Match Analytics 5
      • On Court – Drop Shot
      • On Court – Backhand Line
      • On Court – Return Of Serve
      • Francisco Clavet – 1
      • Francisco Clavet – 2
      • Francisco Clavet – 3
      • Review 1
      • Review 2
      • Review 3
      • Match: Jeff 1st Serves
      • Match: Jeff 2nd Serves
      • Match: Francisco 1st Serves
      • Match: Francisco’s 2nd Serves
      • Match Intelligence 1
      • Match Intelligence 2
      • Match Intelligence 3
    • GamePlan
      • Welcome To GAMEPLAN
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • First Point Serving
      • The 43% Upgrade
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • Break Points
      • Returns: Forehand v Backhand
      • Returns: Made/Winners/Errors
      • Returns: Deuce Court
      • Returns: Ad Court
      • Double Faults
      • The First 4 Shots: Murray v Nishikori
      • Strategy Analysis 1 – Becoming No. 1 In The World
      • Strategy Analysis 2 – Climbing The Rankings
    • Dirtballer
      • START HERE — Introduction
      • Men Rally Length: 2017 RG vs US Open
      • Women Rally Length: 2017 RG vs. US Open
      • 2016 RG vs 2017 Australian Open
      • Nadal Dominance On Clay
      • Nadal Career Stats – Clay vs Hard
      • Rafael Nadal: 23 Masters 1000 Matches
      • More Lessons
  • Presentations
  • Blog
  • About Craig
    • Match IQ: College Tennis
    • Match IQ: Pro Tennis
    • Business Speaking
    • Success Stories
    • Team Djokovic 2017-2019
    • Interviews
    • Tennis Channel Feature: Moneyball In Tennis
    • Tennis Channel One Minute Clinics
    • Tennis Magazine Feature
    • Border Mail Front Page
    • ATP Match Analysis
    • ATP Beyond The Numbers
    • Craig In The News
Buy Tennis Strategy
  • Home
  • Ben Shelton
  • 2024 US Open Serve Analysis. Which Is Better? Foot Back Or Foot Up?
CLICK HERE To Purchase Webinars & Courses.
Tuesday, 01 October 2024 / Published in Ben Shelton, Coco Gauff, Frances Tiafoe, Grigor Dimitrov, Matteo Berrettini, Naomi Osaka, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Roland Garros, Serving, Taylor Fritz, US Open

2024 US Open Serve Analysis. Which Is Better? Foot Back Or Foot Up?

G’day,

Is it better to keep your foot back or bring it up in your service motion?

On the surface, both seem to work just fine. It really depends on what feels right for you and what you were taught when you were younger. It feels like players get to load more and explode upward with their legs when bringing the back foot up. Players seem to look more controlled when leaving it back, as well as looking more coordinated with their lower and upper body.

Take a look at the picture above. Both Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic leave their right foot back. Both Andy Murray and Rafael Nadal bring the back foot up. If the Big Four are split 50-50, then you could imagine the rest of the men’s and women’s tours are also split roughly the same.

Nothing can be further from the truth.

I analyzed all 128 men and women at the 2024 US Open from match replays on my media terminal. I really didn’t know what to expect as a final result.

Personally, I always brought my foot up as a junior as I was serving and volleying on everything at the Albury grass courts. It felt quicker to get to the net. But I also knew I didn’t always correctly time my legs with the upper body and would occasionally get shoulder pain as a result. So I tried leaving the foot back and got mixed results. Even today, I sometimes go back and forth between the two motions and, depending on the day, will serve well (or poorly) with either.


2024 US OPEN MEN

Here’s the breakdown from the men’s draw.

2024 US Open Men’s Draw

  • Foot Stays Back = 28% (36)
  • Foot Comes Up = 72%  (92)
  • Total = 128 players

Almost three out of four (72%) male players at this year’s US Open preferred to bring their foot up in the service motion. That’s very lopsided. The men’s final featured one of each, with Jannik Sinner bringing his foot up while Taylor Fritz left it back.

So, what’s the benefit of bringing it up?

After watching all 92 players bringing their back foot up, three things stood out to me with this specific motion.


IMPROVE YOUR SERVE – HOLD MORE SERVICE GAMES

Webinar 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns

Webinar 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks

Webinar 16: Serve +1 Strategy

Webinar 21: Serve & Volley / Return & Volley

Webinar 34: The 8 Serve Locations


1: Anchor

There were differences in how the back foot moved from being back to coming up. Some players picked the back foot up and moved it in the air, and then put it back down. Other players dragged it lightly against the court surface. Others really dug their back foot into the court surface, anchoring themselves to the court so they could “release” at the right time and explode up through the serve. Anchoring to the ground was a common theme.

2. Upper & Lower Body Coordination

This didn’t always go as planned. There were times when the toss was a little off, and the timing of the back foot coming up was a little off, and the upper and lower parts of the body didn’t look like they were working together. Some serves looked awkward, or had too much energy delivered for too little result.

3. Back Foot On The Ground

This varied widely. Sometimes the back foot was held back for a long time and only did a “touch and go” when it came up, spending very little time with the feet together. Other times, the back foot came up very early, and the player lost balance with two feet so close together for such a long period of time. Getting the timing right of when the back foot up (not too early / not too late) and how long to keep it on the ground slightly behind the lead foot distinguished good serves from great ones.

4: Knee Bend & Explode

Think of Ben Shelton. He loads all his energy back and then brings his back foot up right behind his front foot. He loads all his energy low with a big knee bend. He then explodes out of that position, up into the ball, and forward into the court.

Ben Shelton Service Motion

The fastest ten servers at the 2024 US Open are below. The three players in red (Dimitrov, Fritz & Tiafoe) all left their foot back on their serve. All the others brought it up.

  1. Ben Shelton: 143mph (230 km/h).
  2. Reilly Opelka: 142 mph (229 km/h).
  3. Jiri Lehecka: 137 mph (220 km/h).
  4. Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard: 137 mph (220 km/h).
  5. Otto Virtanen: 137 mph (220 km/h).
  6. Grigor Dimitrov: 137 mph (220 km/h).
  7. Tomas Etcheverry: 137 mph (220 km/h).
  8. Gabriel Diallo: 136 mph (219 km/h).
  9. Alexander Zverev: 135 mph (217 km/h).
  10. Matteo Berrettini: 135 mph (217 km/h).
  11. Taylor Fritz: 135 mph (217 km/h).
  12. Frances Tiafoe: 135 mph (217 km/h).

The fact that three of the 12 fastest servers kept their foot back instead of bringing it up proves that you can still get right around the same power doing it either way.


2024 US OPEN WOMEN

The gap between serving with the foot back or bringing it up gets even more expansive in the women’s draw.

2024 US Open Women’s Draw

  • Foot Stays Back = 12 % (15)
  • Foot Comes Up = 88 %  (113)
  • Total = 128 players

This is quite remarkable. Only 15 women out of the entire women’s draw of 128 players elected to keep their foot back when serving. Let’s see how many made it into the fastest servers.

  1. Coco Gauff: 125 mph (201 km/h).
  2. Paula Badosa: 121 mph (195 km/h)
  3. Jessika Ponchet: 119 mph (192 km/h)
  4. Naomi Osaka: 119 mph (192 km/h)
  5. Liudmila Samsanova: 119 mph (192 km/h)
  6. Aryna Sabalenka: 119 mph (192 km/h)
  7. Emma Navarro: 118 mph (190 km/h)
  8. Petra Martic: 117 mph (188 km/h)
  9. Taylor Townsend: 117 mph (188 km/h)
  10. Caroline Dolehide 117 mph (188 km/h)
  11. Beatriz Haddad Maia: 117 mph (188 km/h)

Only one server in the leading 11 (tied at 117 mph) kept their foot back when serving.

Coco Gauff Serving 2024 US Open

Gauff’s serve was not at its best at the US Open this year in the four matches she played.

  • Aces = 15
  • Double Faults = 38 (including 19 vs. Emma Navarro)
  • 51% 1st Serves In
  • 75% 1st Serves Won
  • 46% 2nd Serves Won
  • Service Games Won = 35
  • Service Games Lost = 7

Gauff’s serve problems were multiple. Making contact too low was the primary issue. Not being able to control speed and spin was another. Sometimes the upper body and lower body got out of sync. This certainly looked like the case this year. Here’s Gauff’s serve data from the 2023 US Open, which she won (7 matches).

  • Aces = 26
  • Double Faults = 26
  • 58% 1st Serves In
  • 69% 1st Serves Won
  • 52% 2nd Serves Won
  • Service Games Won = 60
  • Service Games Lost = 19

Gauff only served 26 double faults in 18 sets last year. She served 38 in 10 sets this year. There seemed to be a lack of communication with the lower and upper body.


SUMMARY

We overwhelmingly teach players to bring their back foot up on the serve to generate more help power from the lower body. That’s especially the case in the women’s draw at the US Open this year.

That does not make it right or wrong, as we saw excellent serve performances with both variations in the men’s and women’s draw. Just like the one-handed and two-handed backhands, there are pros and cons with both versions of the serve.

Data such as this is something we may have suspected with our eyes, but it’s always good to remove the guesswork. Only 28% of the men and 12% of the women leave the back foot back during the serve motion. It works just fine for Federer, Djokovic, Fritz and Tiafoe.

Coaches should expose young players to both versions to see what fits best.

Cheers,

Craig

  • Tweet

The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Join 1000's of other tennis players. Enter your email address to get exclusive access to all our latest tennis strategies, including behind the scenes photos, videos & more!

Ten Tennis Strategy Products

Brain Game Tennis is the world leader researching and teaching strategy in tennis. Below are ten products to choose from to remove the guesswork and opinion from your game.

THE FIRST 4 SHOTS

The practice court is clearly broken. Here’s the proof.

Points are "front loaded". By far the majority of the action, and the winning, takes place in THE FIRST 4 SHOTS. The practice court is full of long rallies. Matches are dominated by short rallies. There is a massive disconnect occurring.

We spend too much time grinding, banging balls up and down the middle of the court – that have no real benefit to winning tennis matches.

There are 3 specific rally lengths in tennis. Here is their percentage breakdown of total points.

0-4 Shots = 70%
5-8 Shots = 20%
9+ Shots = 10%

The First 4 Shots is specifically the serve, return, Serve +1 groundstroke and Return +1 groundstroke. Those are normally the shots that get practiced the least, but matter the most to winning tennis matches.

Short Ball Hunter

The net is an extremely high percentage place to be!

If you love playing tennis for fun, spend as much time at the baseline as you like. But if you compete – if the score matters – then you must turn your attention to the net to maximize your potential.

The “herd mentality” in tennis thinks it’s too tough to approach the net in today’s game. The conversation starts with improved string technology, more powerful rackets, and finishes with stronger, faster athletes. The herd think approaching is a relic of the past. The herd is WRONG!

AVERAGE WIN %
Baseline = 46%
Net = 66%

Data from ALL Grand Slams provides the facts about approach and volley, and the data is crystal clear – it’s immensely better than staying back at the baseline, grinding for a living.

Num3ers

The baseline is a tough place to create separation. Here's how to do it.

At the 2012 US Open, only 7 men and 14 women had a winning percentage from the baseline. At Wimbledon 2016, Andy Murray won the title only winning 52% of his baseline points - and he is one of the very best at it in the world!

Num3ers deeply explores the data that rules points, especially from the back of the court. Take a "deep dive" into all three rally lengths (0-4, 5-8, 9+), and winner and errors totals from the elite level of our game. The numbers will shock you!

All 4 Grand Slams

Forcing Errors = 41% Men / 37% Women
Winners = 32% Men / 29% Women
Unforced Errors = 27% Men / 34% Women

Num3ers is very much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. It's about bringing together different data sets together to create the big picture.

Dou8les Num3ers

Doubles Numbers

Every recorded match from the 2015 Australian Open - Rd2 to the final.

There is a lot happening on a doubles court. Situations and strategies are constantly being adjusted to create mis-matches with court position. It's hard to keep track of - until now. Dou8les Num3ers is the most comprehensive analysis of doubles data in our sport. The focus is on how a point ends, and it's broken down eight ways to Sunday. Specifically, you find critical information on:

Winners rise to the #1 way a point ends (over forced & unforced errors)

- The last shot of the rally is overwhelmingly struck at the net.
- Center Window: the most important part of a doubles court to control.
- Stephen Huss: an in-depth interview on Wimbledon's Centre Court with the 2005 Wimbledon Doubles Champion.

Dou8les Num3ers leaves no stone unturned. Percentage breakdowns of how often the server or receiver hits the last shot highlight the dramatic influence of the serve. The last shot of the rally is significant, and is broken down into the following categories: volleys, overheads, passing shots, lobs and groundstrokes.

between the points

When you play a match, you actually play two matches.

When you walk out onto a tennis court, there are two matches that you are about to play. The first is during the point - a part of the match that you have spent a lot of time preparing for on the practice court. But there is a second match, that takes place in the 20 seconds between the points. This is where the mental and emotional aspects of our sport kick in.

Let's face it, there will be adversity in almost every tennis match that you play. The storm clouds are coming. How bug they are, and how long they last for, are up to you.

Between the points is very tennis specific. It provides a roadmap for the 20 seconds between the points, teaching how to handle the adversity that will surely come, and how to build on the successes that will also be present. Your mind is your biggest asset in a match, and Between the Points takes your hand off the self destruct button and stops you beating yourself.

25 golden rules of singles strategy

You don't have to be good at everything, but you have got to be good at something.

You can break tennis down into four key elements - serving, returning, rallying and approaching. Each part has specific patterns of play that consistently deliver higher winning percentages than the others. No more guessing. No more opinions. All facets of our sport are covered in this exceptional product, clearly outlining what patterns to gravitate to, and how to best construct the practice court. Data comes primarily from the 2015 Australian Open.

Building Blocks

MEN = 70% errors / 30% winners
WOMEN = 74% errors / 26% winners

Forcing errors is the best way to construct a point.
You can simply break tennis down into primary and secondary patterns of play - and they are all covered here. Primary patterns include serve and return direction, forehands v backhands, and the best way to approach the net. Secondary patterns include drop shots, serve & volley and 1st volley options. If you play tournaments, this product will greatly help you simplify the singles court.

25 golden rules of doubles

The conversation starts & ends with the Center Window.

The doubles court is like an hourglass. There are two big ends, but a small neck in the middle where all the action happens. Once you learn the power of the Center Window, where you stand to start the point will take on a lot more significance.

Doubles is a lot more about situations, with four people on the court all "dancing" with one another. Learn all the best doubles patterns, broken down for the server, returner, server's partner and the returner's partner.

Doubles Situations

The "J" - the most ideal movement for the returner's partner to attack the net.

The "V" - a better way of understanding where the server's partner should move to.

Volley Targets - there are four main areas to attack. Know which ones are higher percentage. Beach Volleyball - the idea of a "setter" and "spiker" is ideal for the doubles court.

There are certain parts of the court that the ball travels to a lot, and other low percentage areas that you really don't want to cover at all - like the alley! In general, the serving team wants to keep the ball in the middle of the court as much as possible (to help the server's partner), while the returning team benefits from hitting wider and creating more chaos in the point.

Dirtballer

Dirtballer clay court tennis course

Getting Tight

Getting Tight tennis strategy course

Welcome to our Twitter Feed

Tweets by @BrainGameTennis

Join The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Enter your email address to get exclusive, behind the scenes photos, videos and interviews!

Contact Craig O’Shannessy







    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    • GET SOCIAL

    © 2019 Brain Game Tennis.
    Designed & Directed by Craig O'Shannessy

    TOP